Waves tune vs autotune reddit. Let me ask you something.

Waves tune vs autotune reddit if you have a mono voice coming in and use an autotune effect, the mono version you have a few options, depending on where you've inserted the plugin. to be completely honest i prefer waves tune its way cheaper and i find it gives me a way better result especially for a heavy autotune sound. Waves Tune Real Time operates like Auto Tune. But as long as you keep the auto tune on the vocal track you should be good. Autotune almost always sounds better if you can afford the extra time it requires. Yes, they will tune your vocals, but in a different way that results in a different sound. I bought Waves Tune RT after reading online that it was better at the pure robotic autotune effect than Antares and Melodyne… to be real honest, yes but it does sound different from auto-tune. Another bonus of waves-tune real time is you can put it on EVERYTHING and it won’t really hit your dsp usage that hard. if you insert a mono-> stereo plugin the track will become a stereo track but with identical L&R but is automatically set to have the same output level (no summation). 12 votes, 18 comments. I feel it’s much smoother in the way the notes transition and it just sounds really good. i’ve also seen some of the mix engineers that work on uzis songs use it proving it’s industry standard stuff. if you have a mono input (vocals without any stereo effects) and want a mono output (vocals without any stereo effects with a mono effect applied), you use a mono plugin. So Waves Tune is an exercise in patience, panning around awkwardly with an outdated UI. It's worth keeping in mind that all of these plugins received the exact same input Antares auto tune access or Waves Tune RT With the black Friday deals I’m contemplating one of the softwares mentioned, wanted to hear peoples experience before purchasing Locked post. If you need to literally make the vocal, talking build the harmonies, so it’s palatable- melodyne is the choice. I like auto tune as well but idk but maybe it’s just me. As a professional mixing and mastering engineer I’d recommend just grabbing the Antares ultimate subscription and trying out all of their respective auto tune plugins, if you want an uzi vert sound then go waves tune as that’s the actual tuner he uses but Antares has a guaranteed better tracking system for notes and you’ll have a better Waves Tune Realtime (not Waves Tune) is surprisingly good. If you just needed a tuner for pitch correction and not crazy auto tune effects, I might actually suggest waves-tune real time. Also it doesn’t have those clicks and pops that the new versions of auto tune has. on a mono track you can just do mono. but it still does sound as obvious. even when you put the retune speed to zero it doesn’t sound as choppy as auto-tune. The issue is in hip hop, 100% of major artists use autotune, so if you're going for that sound, waves tunes or melodyne won't work. Waves Tune can make significant changes to pitch and be quite transparent but as always it also depends on the singer, their general control and tone. Idk why but waves tune kind of sounds better than Auto tune. I prefer the slate digital metatune infterface; but don’t think it catches notes as good as auto tune. You might just have a weird taste in autotune sound, which is totally fine, but if you used both and preferred waves tune, it makes me think you might have been doing something wrong with the settings on autotune. I can get Waves Tune Real-Time for $50. use stereo if the output is supposed to be stereo, independent of what the input is (like with reverb) or if the input signal isn't full mono. Probably super obvious, but I've seen some people that just leave it on default. Would mostly be used for a cheap way to get somewhat natural sounding pitch correction for live vocals. . Waves Tune produces a very sharp sounding result with very crisp tones, but it has a huge artifact towards the end of the sample. I melodyne into auto tune, and just fix any notes that are triggering the tuner incorrectly or to fix little imperfections, timing etc. If you need to fix a vocal with surgical precision- Auto-tune graphical mode is my choice. The business of vocal tuning and pitch correction plugins is huge, for two reasons. Let me ask you something. Auto-Tune 5, which some call classic, sounds much different than newer versions. I want to ask you whether you prefer using waves tune or waves tune real-time or Melodyne? My purpose is to sound natural with good tuning. Apart from whether you might one day need to work on a song that changes speed half way though, there's the other issue of having a 10 minute limit on the length of the music (as Waves Tune does. Does the autotune in Waves Tune sound the same as in Antares? Or does Antares's autotune sound better? I got Autotune EVO for free a while back but latency is an issue so that's why I will need EFX or WavesTune, but I don't want to invest into Waves regretting EFX sounded better and it was a better Waves Tune Real-Time or Auto-Tune Access Both are on sale for $30. The m1 update in pro tools from AT artist has been buggy which made me look into AT hybrid (the pro tools specific version) but the price on that is outrageous. I use Waves Tune 90% of the time, the built in Cubase pitch correction 8% and Melodyne 2% Ya waves tune for post rec or waves tune real time for “as you record” tuning I have melodyne too and honestly use the waves a lot of the time Gets the job done and it’s like 30 bucks each Both are a nightmare to use. That could work for manual correction as well. I dont know how to attach a picture but just look up "waves tune" on google images and youll see what I mean. Auto-Tune is definitely better between the two. I bought waves tune a long time ago and hated it. Autotune sounds the best. Sep 28, 2022 · At first glance Waves Tune and Antares Auto-Tune EFX+ both look very different but on one level they will actually deliver similar sound qualities: they both do vocal tuning corrections and the famous artificial tuning effect. I'm just a singer and im literally talking about the registry on the waves tune plugins which dont register my voice below E1 on the keyboard that is literally in the waves plugin. I think melodyne has sales so you could get the essentials cheaper. The cool thing you might not have tried, though, is using MIDI to control the notes. Auto-Tune sounds a lot different than waves tune, and different versions of Auto-Tune sound different than other versions. ) It’s so much faster too. Oct 11, 2018 · Autotune would be the easiest tool with which to automate formant shifts like that. I never used a yamaha or a roland or whatever. He said that he uses waves tune in his works. If you’re getting in sessions to mix and work on that have auto-tune, then sure get it. Someone else mentioned Melodyne, but that's useful for getting a very natural sounding vocal take that's precise - used a lot for pop vocals especially. Even though many would say that synthetic vibrato is a gimmick, Waves and CrispyTuner both give you that feature at far lower prices. Jul 11, 2021 · Even though many would say that synthetic vibrato is a gimmick, Waves and CrispyTuner both give you that feature at far lower prices. Jun 6, 2023 · My workflow is tuning manually gently/hardly at all with melodyne which runs through autotune on auto mode. It's worth keeping in mind that all of these plugins received the exact same input Waves tune sounds like fucking dog shit and no professional artist who autotunes their vocals uses it. I already use waves tune real time but it sounds so robotic when I decrease the note transition and so bad when I increase it. If Auto-tune Pro has a resizable Window then it wins easily. Melodyne is great if you're doing a lot of manual pitch editing and autotune is easiest to slap on and go. (But reatune is even worse) Waves has another autotune which i believe can be controlled by midi. There's the obvious need to correct a singer's vocal issues as, of course, we don't all boast the best voices. Waves tune kinda underrated These are issues that many people don't consider when buying automated tuning software. waves tune rt is really best at making realistic sounding tuning. However, I don’t want to spend over one hundred dollars on it. In a nutshell: Waves Tune Real Time and Auto Tune = automatic pitch correction, Melodyne = manual pitch correction via an editor. Here's a tip, if you didn't know! First off, be sure to set the scale and limit the notes. But 5/classic is still the most popular being used for the hard effect. Sep 28, 2022 · It's the big Antares Auto-Tune vs Waves Tune head-to-head as we line up two of the biggest names in vocal processing. Don't get me wrong; I'm a huge Waves fan and own most of their plugins But Waves Tune needs its UI to be completely reworked. If you need to generally make the vocal more transparent and quickly- waves-tune realtime. Can’t believe it’s so cheap. Old Waves Tune operates like Melodyne. Waves Tune Real Time is only $29 on some websites. I used waves tune for a while and have a couple of problems with it. I would do the Antares subscription though until you can either bug a version you like or something Most autotune tutorials that use Antares autotune 8 or below don’t really sound that great (compared to the autotune in recent songs) and I’ve seen people claiming that most engineers actually use Autotune EFX 3 nowadays. But if you are just doing your own stuff there is no need to get anything outside of Waves Real-time tune. Melda has mautopitch in their free fx bundle. smpfge rcopmo orocq tfoepqby oupgj oyuudf sxy gvwpd qanef xbnqf